![]() ![]() As with all things, they each have a trial version to test out (highly recommended), and the comparison charts for RX and SpectraLayers are available.⚠️ Requirements for installations without Steinberg Download Assistantīefore installing any of the Cubase 11 components below the following utilities must be installed resp. The display resolution in Pro 9 (and responsiveness of the GUI) is better IMO, and they are obviously monitoring each other's products (navigation is identical in many regards between them). SpectraLayers Pro 9 also includes features of RX Advanced (Ambient matching and some of the more precision tools), so it really comes down to what you want to use it for (and if you already own RX Standard/Advanced). In many cases it can also be mixed into another composition. ![]() If mixing back into the same master, it is pretty transparent since the material missing that caused the phasing is in another stem. SpectraLayers (Pro) will also drill down two more levels of unmixing, but it is very dependent on the reverb usage in the master to get a pristine (or even suitable) track. From that perspective, RX Standard would match that feature. Both of them took roughly 90 seconds to unmix stems from a song 7:30 in length. I did a quick test of this (RX 9 Advanced versus SpectraLayers Pro 9), and the unmix stem results were comparable on the same song using default presets. When you click "Separate" in the Rebalance window, it splits the audio into four stems vocal/bass/percussion/other as new tabs in the RX Editor. It is called "Music Rebalance" and you will find it referenced by same in the manual. I've only used RX 9 Standard for "fixing" problems (usually some kind of noise) in old recordings. I have not used the stem separator, other than to observe the function out of curiosity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |